Skip to content
97.5% of teams see value from GC AI before month oneSee how
Back To All Clauses

Service Level Credits Clause

A clause giving the customer a partial credit when the vendor misses a committed service level, such as uptime, often as the customer's only remedy for the failure.

Reviewed by GC AI Solutions Team•Updated September 2026

Definition

A service level credits clause gives the customer a defined credit, usually a percentage of the monthly fee, when the vendor fails to meet a committed service level such as uptime or response time. The credit is calculated against a measured commitment, like 99.9 percent monthly availability, over a measurement period. The clause is defined as much by its limits as its credits: a credit cap, exclusions for scheduled maintenance and force majeure, a short claim window, and, most consequentially, language making the credit the customer's sole and exclusive remedy for the failure.

What It Does

A service level credits clause sets the price the vendor pays for falling short, and quietly caps what the customer can recover. The mechanics look reassuring: a 99.9 percent uptime commitment, a tiered credit schedule, a monthly measurement. The sting is usually one sentence stating that service credits are the customer's sole and exclusive remedy. For in-house counsel, that sentence is the whole negotiation, because it can turn a catastrophic outage into a token credit. A practical test: if your SaaS agreement gives a 10 percent credit for missing 99.9 percent uptime and makes that the sole remedy, a full-day outage during your peak season is worth a 10 percent credit and nothing else, no matter the business damage. The real protection is rarely the credit; it is a chronic-failure termination right that escapes the cap.

  • Credits the customer a share of fees when a service level is missed

  • Measures against a committed level, such as monthly uptime, over a defined period

  • Caps total credits and excludes maintenance, force majeure, and customer-caused issues

  • Often makes the credit the sole and exclusive remedy for service-level failures

  • Is meaningfully improved by a chronic-failure termination right

The credit schedule is the visible part; the sole-remedy language and the chronic-failure exit are where the value sits.

When You'll See It

Service level credits appear in SaaS subscription agreements, cloud, hosting, and colocation contracts, telecom and connectivity agreements, managed services agreements, and payment-processing contracts. The clause usually lives in a service level agreement exhibit or schedule rather than the main body, which is one reason it gets less scrutiny than it deserves. The commitment varies by service: uptime and availability for hosting, response and resolution times for support, transaction success rates for payments.

It matters most where the service is operationally critical and downtime hits revenue: a customer-facing application, a payment rail, a system of record. The more your business stops when the vendor's service stops, the more the credit cap and the sole-remedy language decide whether the SLA is real protection or a rounding error.

Examples

Super Micro Computer, Inc.

Master Colocation Services AgreementDefines the credit and makes it the sole remedyOne-Sided2024
"'Service Level Credit' means a monetary credit potentially payable to Customer in respect of a Service Level Default... Service Level Credits will constitute Customer's sole and exclusive remedy for any damages caused by a Service Level Default, except as otherwise set forth in the Service Level Agreement."
Source

AppTech Payments Corp.

Master Services and Development AgreementCredit as a percentage of the monthly fee, tied to uptimeOne-Sided2023
"'Service Credit' is a US Dollar credit, calculated as set forth below, that AppTech will credit back to an eligible Customer account as a percentage of the monthly value of the minimum Fee, based on AppTech's failure to meet the Monthly Uptime Percentage for a service month period."
Source

BriaCell Therapeutics Corp. / Prevail

Master Service and Technology AgreementAvailability formula with a credit on missOne-Sided2023
"...(43,200 minutes in a month) - (60 minutes of Service Interruption) / 43,200 = 43,140 / 43,200 = 0.999 Service Availability for the month would be 99.9%... If Prevail does not meet the Availability for a given month, then Prevail will provide a credit."
Source

Negotiate

If you're the customer:

You depend on the service

  • Treat the credit as a small consolation and focus on a chronic-failure termination right, so repeated misses, such as three months in a row or a drop below a floor, let you exit, often with a refund.
  • Carve security, confidentiality, and data-protection breaches out of the sole-remedy language, so they are not capped at a service credit.
  • Require a clear measurement methodology and a reasonable claim window, and resist exclusions broad enough to swallow the commitment.

If you're the vendor:

You want predictable exposure

  • Make service credits the sole and exclusive remedy for service-level failures, and cap total credits per measurement period.
  • Define exclusions for scheduled maintenance, force majeure, and customer-caused issues, and require the customer to request credits within a short window.
  • Consider an earn-back mechanism that restores credits after a period of meeting the service levels.

The dollars in the credit schedule are rarely the real stake, so spend the negotiation on the sole-remedy cap and the exit for chronic failure.

Red Flags

  • Service credits as the sole and exclusive remedy with no chronic-failure termination right, capping recovery at a token credit.

  • An uptime commitment with exclusions so broad, including vague “factors outside our control,” that they swallow the SLA.

  • A short claim window that forfeits credits the customer does not request in time.

  • No stated measurement methodology, so availability is whatever the vendor reports.

  • Sole-remedy language that also bars recovery for security or confidentiality breaches, not just performance misses.

Service Level Credits Clause FAQs

What is a service level credit?
It is a credit, usually a percentage of the monthly fee, that a vendor owes the customer when it fails to meet a committed service level such as uptime. It is the contractual consequence of missing the service level agreement's targets.
Are service credits the only remedy for downtime?
Often, yes, by design. Many SLAs state that service credits are the customer's sole and exclusive remedy for service-level failures, which caps recovery at the credit even when an outage causes far greater loss. Customers usually negotiate carve-outs and a chronic-failure termination right to escape that cap.
How are service level credits calculated?
Typically as a percentage of the monthly fee, on a tiered schedule keyed to how far the vendor missed the commitment, measured over a defined period such as a calendar month. For example, availability is measured against total minutes in the month, and a shortfall below the committed percentage triggers a credit.
What is a chronic failure termination right?
It is a clause letting the customer terminate, and sometimes recover a refund, when the vendor misses service levels repeatedly, such as several months in a row or below a defined floor. It is the main remedy that escapes the service-credit cap, which is why it matters more than the credit itself.
What is excluded from an SLA uptime commitment?
Common exclusions include scheduled maintenance, force majeure, issues caused by the customer or third parties, and beta features. The breadth of these exclusions determines how meaningful the uptime commitment is, so they deserve as much attention as the percentage.

Related Clauses

This content is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.