CZ and FriendsS1 E38
The Kanye Clause, Taylor Swift IP, and AI: Wayfair's Legal Team Explains

Mary Ambacher
Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary, EverQuote

Lauren Anderson
Senior Counsel, Wayfair
Episode Overview
The Kanye clause is a morality provision, now standard in influencer and endorsement agreements, that lets a company exit a deal when talent becomes a reputational liability. It earned its name after Adidas's slow, costly split from Ye, a breakup The Fashion Law chronicled as the moment morals clauses got rewritten across the industry.
On this episode of CZ and Friends, Mary Ambacher, Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at EverQuote, and Lauren Anderson, Senior Counsel at Wayfair, join GC AI co-founder and CEO Cecilia Ziniti to talk morality clauses at influencer scale, Taylor Swift's IP playbook, and how lean in-house legal teams use AI to keep pace with contract volume.
Mary and Lauren spent years together on Wayfair's legal team, where the two became close friends. Mary left in April 2026 to lead legal at EverQuote, the publicly traded insurance marketplace.
Between them, they have negotiated thousands of influencer agreements, supported a Super Bowl ad, and rebuilt how an e-commerce giant thinks about contract risk.
About Mary Ambacher and Lauren Anderson
Mary Ambacher is Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary at EverQuote, where she joined in April 2026 to lead the legal function.
She spent nearly eight years on Wayfair's legal team before that, rising to Associate General Counsel and anchoring the company's SEC and corporate governance work. She is based in Boston.
Lauren Anderson is Senior Counsel at Wayfair. She joined in May 2024 as commercial counsel and took on an expanded scope after Mary's departure.
She is one of three attorneys, plus a part-time colleague, who review the commercial contracts moving through the company. Before Wayfair, she handled IP, supply chain, and logistics work at a startup.
Key Takeaways
- The Kanye clause lets brands exit a deal over reputational risk. Standard since Adidas's costly Yeezy split, it now shows up in agreements with small and mid-size influencers too, where the law of large numbers guarantees someone eventually says the wrong thing.
- A "Taylor Swift clause" for AI and likeness rights could be next. Mary predicts protection for an artist's voice and image from unauthorized AI use will spread to other artists' contracts because the biggest name in music took the stand first.
- AI-first hiring changed what a rebuilt legal team looks like. Mary arrived at EverQuote expecting to rebuild a scaled-down version of her Wayfair team, and hired a senior contract specialist and a paralegal instead of a bench of attorneys.
- A B-plus standard, not perfection, is the right bar for routine contracts. Mary saves A-plus attention for SEC filings and public disclosures, and lets AI hold the line on the hundredth NDA, at hour five of a diligence review when a tired associate starts to skim.
- Contract flexibility is the legal team's biggest gift to the business. One-year terms, termination for convenience, and credits for unused capacity, because nobody can say what software the company will need in three years.
Chapters
- 0:00The Kanye Clause, Taylor Swift IP, and AI: Mary Ambacher of EverQuote and Lauren Anderson of Wayfair
- 0:12Introductions And The AI Setup
- 1:07Starting Over In A New Role
- 6:36Wayfair’s Lean Team Reality
- 11:37Metrics Playbooks And Contract Triage
- 15:25When AI Replaces Junior Reps
- 21:03Flexibility Clauses That Save Deals
- 31:41Resetting Risk In Regulated Industries
- 34:12Taylor Swift IP And AI Likeness
- 37:28Morality Clauses For Influencer Scale
- 42:29The Next Legal Org And Outside Counsel
- 46:12Lightning Round And Closing Advice
What Is the Kanye Clause in an Influencer Agreement?
The Kanye clause is a morality provision granting a company termination for cause if talent is involved in a scandal, alleged or proven, that could harm the brand's reputation. Lauren Anderson was negotiating one the week this episode was recorded.
The clause exists industry-wide because Adidas famously lacked a clean exit from its Yeezy partnership. The company later projected a short-term hit of up to 250 million euros from ending the relationship, per reporting on the fallout.
The scale problem makes the clause non-negotiable for e-commerce brands. Wayfair's affiliate marketing program spans thousands of small and mid-size influencers, and each agreement is small while the aggregate exposure is large.
Mary put the math plainly:
There are lower contract amounts, but you multiply that by 20,000, and someone says something that maybe Wayfair doesn't want to be associated with for any reason.
Lauren explained why the drafting keeps evolving:
These real-world examples are why terms and conditions are the way they are.
The drafting details do the work. The triggers reach alleged as well as proven conduct, and termination is exercisable in the company's judgment, so the brand itself decides what it can stand behind.
Will There Be a Taylor Swift Clause for Artist IP and AI?
Mary thinks so. On the episode, she described Taylor Swift's recent IP filings covering her image and voice, aimed at blocking AI use of her likeness without permission, as a move that could reshape talent contracts the way the Yeezy fallout reshaped morals clauses.
The mechanism is public opinion as much as the USPTO. Mary's point is that Swift's millions of fans give her stand a weight a lesser-known artist filing the same paperwork could not command.
Mary, a self-described Swiftie, said:
Because she's doing it and taking a stand, millions of Swifties are saying yes, that's awesome. She's already winning in the court of public opinion. Maybe there'll be the Taylor Swift IP clause that [other artists] all get the benefit of.
On air, Cecilia pulled up the precedent. In 2015, Swift published an open letter to Apple, objecting to Apple Music's plan to pay artists nothing during its three-month free trial.
“It's unfair to ask anyone to work for nothing,” Swift wrote, and Apple reversed the policy. As Mary noted, that predated AI, and Swift wrote the letter herself.
How Does a Three-Attorney Team Handle Wayfair's Contract Volume?
With triage, playbooks, and a legal AI first pass. Lauren's team of three attorneys, plus a part-time colleague, reviews the commercial contracts moving through Wayfair.
She described closing out nearly 300 agreements in a two-and-a-half-month window at the end of last year, with each attorney averaging 50 agreements on a biweekly basis. Wayfair is a GC AI customer, and the platform anchors the first-pass layer of that system.
Lauren described the workflow:
We use GC AI often. We've implemented a process where you rely on it for a first pass. We want to get rid of the mundane, repetitive tasks and ... be more involved in the business.
The triage rules do the rest. Excluded contract categories go to a non-lawyer, monetary thresholds dictate attention, and renewals get a lighter review. The point is precision about where attorney judgment goes. Lauren reads a contract for a SaaS vendor that touches PII or sits inside Wayfair's systems differently from a routine renewal.
Should a New Deputy GC Build the Legal Team Around AI First?
Mary's answer after three weeks at EverQuote is yes, and take your time before hiring. She arrived expecting to rebuild a scaled-down Wayfair team.
Then she explored the AI already available to the company and hired a senior contract specialist and a paralegal instead of a bench of attorneys, leaving room to find the gaps that need a specialist.
“With the two of us and some AI tools, we can probably get a lot more done than maybe five years ago without them,” Mary said. “I'm trying to give myself some time to figure out where the gaps are that we're going to need to fill.”
The morning of the recording, Mary had breakfast with a group of Boston GCs who landed on a counterintuitive point. A startup building legal from zero may have an easier path than a 25-year-old company restructuring a 60-lawyer department around AI.
Her hope for the established teams is redeployment, moving commercial and IP attorneys who have seen hundreds of thousands of contracts into roles where their business pattern-matching is the product.
When Is B-Plus Legal Work Good Enough?
For a large category of contracts, B-plus is the right target, and AI already operates there. Mary built this rule of thumb in her junior associate years.
SEC filings and public disclosures demand A-plus attention to detail, while the hundredth NDA needs far less.
“We were fine with accepting a B-plus or an 85 percent on that because that's all you need for that thing,” Mary said. “Some commercial contracts, I'm like, give me your best C. I just need this out the door and we've got to help the business move.”
Her comparison point is honest about humans, too. A junior attorney reviewing an NDA might get it 65 to 70 percent right.
An experienced associate five hours into diligence has started to skim. AI holds the B-plus line at hour five, which is the advantage for a lean team that has to move.
Lauren added the user side. The AI has the capability, but the lawyer prompting it has to know what B-plus looks like to get there.
How Will Junior Lawyers Build Judgment When AI Does the First Pass?
Neither guest claims a complete answer, and both are honest that this is the open question of the next 12 to 24 months. The work that built their judgment, redlines, diligence reviews, hundreds of contracts, is the work AI now absorbs, which is why judgment is becoming the skill that matters most for in-house lawyers.
Mary framed the stakes:
How do we get to five to ten years from now, when you still need the [experienced lawyers] who've had this business judgment ... from practicing for so long, if you don't have the junior attorneys starting and getting that from the beginning?
Lauren's working answer is deep business knowledge over any single legal skill, plus deliberate trust. Junior lawyers need room to make calls, get some wrong, and learn from the correction.
“You need to be comfortable that you might make the wrong decision and that's okay, we can fix it,” Lauren said. “I think it's reps. You just need to keep going, but you'll get there. It's okay to not always make the 100 percent right decision.”
Why In-House Teams Push for One-Year Terms and Termination for Convenience
Because nobody can predict what software the business will need in three years. Mary and Lauren count contract flexibility as the biggest cultural win of their years together at Wayfair. Shorter terms, termination for convenience, credits for unused capacity, and the ability to ramp consultants up and down all became standard.
When the AI market shifts every few months, a three-year lock-in is a liability, and the legal team taught the whole business to negotiate like it.
“We try to keep contracts generally to a year, with three years being the max,” Lauren said. “Is this something we're actually going to use in three years? I don't think anybody can really make that determination.”
Mary applied the same rule when Wayfair evaluated legal AI platforms. The team tested six legal AI tools and refused long lock-ins on principle, because the leaderboard kept changing. Flexibility became the business culture, and it started with legal.
Recommended Reading
- Protecting the Brand While Moving Fast: Arc'teryx, Nextdoor, and Liquid Death: How consumer-brand legal teams balance speed with brand and reputational risk.
- How Great GCs Think About Growth, Risk, and Crisis Management: Frameworks for presenting risk to leadership and preparing before a crisis hits.
- Why Judgment Is the New Superpower for In-House Lawyers in the Age of AI: The case that judgment, not task execution, is what junior lawyers must build.
Transcript
Cecilia Ziniti01:00
Mary and Lauren, welcome.
Mary Ambacher01:03
Thank you for having us.
Lauren Anderson01:06
Thank you so much.
Cecilia Ziniti01:07
All right, Mary, you just made a big move. We were just chatting about how you haven't had a new job, had to start a new job in eight years. And you literally said something like, I forgot what it's like not to know everything. So you walk into a public company and you're overseeing the whole legal function. Tell us about day one, the kind of first day of school life.
Mary Ambacher01:28
Yeah, it was interesting in that it was much quieter, like day one itself, it was just quiet. And I was kind of walking around as if I had no idea where anything was, which made sense, but it was just such wayfair. got a lot of, know, bigger company in terms of just people around. So there was always buzz and it was just very quiet. And I just remembered being like, okay, now what do I do? So it was...
It was a bit of an adjustment, but I'll say, you know, by day three, it was kind of to the, to the chaos. I think I was saying in drinking from the waterfall, that I was probably anticipating, you know, people were so excited that I was here. They hadn't really had a kind of SEC corporate kind of in-house person really in a long time. A lot of folks that, you know, just have done general governance, but got a great team here on the finance side that was pitching in. So.
You know, they gave me probably 48 hours and then the question started, but it's been really nice. think the biggest kind of scary part was just, you know, I was so used to Wayfair and I could navigate it kind of like the back of my hand and, know, starting that all over. It's exciting, but I'm also like, okay, I need to get there so I can, you know, that comes with your value add, right? Like knowing where everything is and knowing everybody to talk to.
Cecilia Ziniti02:46
you thinking about what success will look like there?
Mary Ambacher02:50
Yeah,
it's a very fascinating question in this topic of AI too, because I think I came in with this, okay, I'm gonna go in, I'm gonna build a team probably similar to maybe what I had before on a smaller scale, just in terms of the business. And then I walked in and we have all these great AI tools we can use. And we hired a great senior contract specialist and paralegal.
And now I'm like, OK, with the two of us and some AI tools, we can probably get a lot more done than maybe five years ago without them. You would need a lot of bodies. So I'm trying to give myself some time to figure out really where are the gaps that we're going to need to fill. Do you need a specialist in something? We're an insurance marketplace. we need some specialty knowledge in the insurance space? And we have an attorney that's been helping with that.
He's also moving into a lot of other stuff too, just because know, small nimble teams and we got these AI tools now. So it's an open question, but I'm trying to figure out really what should the shape of that be.
Cecilia Ziniti04:01
So people talk about kind of building from first principles when you come in and it sounds like, you know, AI is a part of that, of what you're doing. But for anyone else listening, that's like going to be starting a new GC gig and kind of doing that analysis. Like, what are the, are there like specific markers or are there like, you work backwards or, know, cause like I had somebody ask me.
You know, Hey, with AI, do I need to clean sheet my department? And this was someone at a company that been around 25 years. And this person had a team of 60. And I, you know, I didn't, I think it's almost in some ways tougher if you're, kind of have a big team that's been doing things a certain way for a long time versus coming in to something fresh. So you've got the perspective of coming into something fresh. What are, how are you going to do it?
Mary Ambacher04:30
Mm.
Yeah, it's actually very timely. I was at a breakfast this morning with a bunch of other Boston GCs trying to build up some of my network there. And it was on this topic of AI both internally and law firm spend and how are you going to manage that and all those different things. And this exact question kind of came up with some of the folks in the room that have had bigger teams. And we're literally saying, you actually probably have the benefit if you're a new startup and going to be the GC there.
of using AI and building and figuring out what to do versus some of these companies that have been around for a long time and have built these great legal teams and they're talking about, you have great lawyers, but the world is changing. And I think the nice thing that we were talking about, and I hope happens a lot more is rescaling or upscaling some of these attorneys, you know, like there's folks in IP or commercial attorneys that
Lauren and I have talked about a lot could be great just even in the business field. We've seen hundreds of thousands of contracts and sometimes the value add to the business from a commercial attorney is not the legal stuff. It's telling them some business points they've seen a million times. So I think that's part of the conversation of, I would suspect a lot of teams are not gonna continue to grow, but are there ways you can repurpose some of these great minds?
into other things you need. But also for me, then kind of the nice thing is I do have a bit of a benefit of, you we've got a small team and a growing company and we can kind of take a more measured figure out, you know, where are the gaps that we're going to need help on the legal side.
Cecilia Ziniti06:36
All right, let's go to Lauren. So Lauren, you're at Wayfair. Wayfair has been around a long time. My favorite kind of, we have like a bureau table from Wayfair. I think of you all every time I go there, but every time I walk by it. But you've been at Wayfair through a lot of change. Obviously AI came, you started at Wayfair in 24. How are some of the things that, so married departure, you take on a larger scope.
Lauren Anderson06:47
Thank
Mm-hmm.
Cecilia Ziniti07:05
streamlined team. How are you thinking about AI now and then how are you thinking about yourself stepping into this new role?
Lauren Anderson07:13
Yeah, mean, one,
I miss Mary a lot. I mean, she was pretty much like the brains of our department, I would say. So definitely majorly increased scope. think Wayfair has kind of already done a really good job about implementing AI tools and really like pushing us to use various tools. So we kind of had that foundation set, but given we're such a smaller team now, like we pretty much have three attorneys plus one that comes in
out that review all of the contracts that come through the company as well as like various legal issues. So you know we really have to utilize AI as much as possible but like also smartly you know. So we use GCAI like often you know that's kind of we've implemented some sort of process where you know you should really rely on that for some sort of first pass. We really want to like get rid of the mundane and you know the day-to-day.
repetitive tasks and really kind of spend time as Mary said, know, I think AI is going to allow us to make more business decisions and be more involved in the business rather than doing like the day-to-day nitty-gritty work. So I think, you know, my team has really done a really good job about utilizing tools as much as possible and we're going to, you know, continue to ramp that up. How can we be smarter about, you know, utilizing playbooks or
creating tasks or an idea of like a Wayfair brain where we have all of this knowledge throughout the legal team that we can kind of make these more mundane tasks a little more automated, a little faster, because I think at the end of the day when you work for a company like Wayfair, it's all about how quickly can you get the best product out. So that's kind of the goal that we've kind of set for our team.
Cecilia Ziniti09:10
love that.
Mary Ambacher09:10
And I promise I didn't
tell Lauren to pluck me. So thanks, Lauren.
Lauren Anderson09:13
Yeah.
Cecilia Ziniti09:14
There
go. There you go. I love it when that happens naturally. So one of the things you said, you mentioned just a super high volume. So give us an idea. And then you talked about products. So I have to imagine you're literally selling millions of products. So give us a flavor of just the sheer volume of commercial contracts that either go through your team or through the company.
Lauren Anderson09:36
Ooh, I would say, I mean it depends on the season. End of year is crazy. We kind of did a...
time of death at the end of the year, post-mortem, I guess, of how many agreements we reviewed. I believe it was close to 300, but I mean, that was just in a two and a half month window between the team. I would say any of us have, on average, 50 agreements to go through on a bi-weekly basis. Some require more attention.
than others, you we have certain policies in place where we can kind of spend less attention on an agreement versus, you know, a high level spend, something along those lines. But it's definitely a high volume and then you have those miscellaneous requests that don't necessarily require a contract review but does require some sort of legal research or, you know, business judgment. Can we move forward with this, you know, AI feature on our website?
you know, it's not necessarily a tool, it's we're making our own AI chatbot. Like, what does that look like in terms of implementation? What privacy concerns do we have? Those type of things. Yes, yes, yes, we'll do those tomorrow.
Mary Ambacher10:58
And then can we do it tomorrow? It's always
Cecilia Ziniti10:59
I'm literally
Mary Ambacher11:03
tomorrow.
Cecilia Ziniti11:03
looking, you all supported a Super Bowl ad. That must have been a tight timeframe. In your time at Wayfair, you had a Supreme Court case. You must have at any one time. mean, even just on the disputes docket, just keeping the business going. And then, of course, public company in both cases.
Mary Ambacher11:05
Mm-hmm.
Lauren Anderson11:06
Mm-hmm.
Cecilia Ziniti11:26
All right, so on the pulling the the thread a little bit, Lauren, on what good looks like, right? So you said getting the product out the door. It's funny. I was talking with a legal team of a restaurant chain and they said, we were talking, had a similar conversation and they said that at their company, that whenever,
It was easy to get wrapped around the axle about kind of specific processes, but as a North star, they're like, all right, sell more sandwiches, open more stores. That's kind of the thing. And it's like, how do you balance that with, okay, we're going to have legal AI reviewing, you know, indemnity provisions or, whatever it is. Do you create like specific OKRs or like, like, like show us, like, tell us how you do it. Cause I think a lot of people are craving that. so I guess I can go, either of you can take that one, but.
It just, the more, almost the more tactical, the better of like, literally you've got this task, 50 agreements at any one time. you know, I, I'm remembering when I was in BD, we had like three or four or something like that. So, yeah. So tell us about that.
Mary Ambacher12:38
I was going to say like Lauren and I worked on it a lot extensively over the last year when I was still away fair, like trying to come up with exactly that, like how we're going to measure success using it, one to show RGC, because he was very keen to obviously get the most out of it, but show that we were being productive with it. know, there's a good example of you can get an AI tool and you can have it go through every single sentence of a contract and help you. And that's not saving you any time while you're going line by line with it.
So we came up with kind of two buckets and obviously Lauren, can tell me if you guys keep doing them, but it was kind of like, what are the things that can just get reviewed? And even by a non-lawyer, Lauren and I set up a good process with our procurement team there to actually do some of the contracts themselves and then have Lauren and team focus on the high level ones. And then truly to your point, just metrics, right? So how many contracts are we getting through in a month?
Or we have a thing that could tell you like time to open to close. Is that getting shorter? And just kind of using like the data.
Lauren Anderson13:45
Yeah, yeah, we still have it in place. Yeah, so we have things like, you know, excluded contracts or, you know, of course, we're spending a lot more time on an agreement that's over a certain threshold monetarily, you know. And I think to Mary's point, it's not about using these AI tools to read line by line. I think what's important and kind of the question that we have about like training junior lawyers, like how
Mary Ambacher13:48
Great.
Lauren Anderson14:15
to how do you get to that point of not using it to read line by line and really like focusing on, okay, I know this SaaS vendor is accessing some sort of PII or it's going to be ingrained in the way fair systems. Like there's more risks associated. like knowing that, how can I look at this contract differently?
So I think really just like level setting that training for the rest of our team is super important. And we've kind of tried to train them up on that and make sure that, you know, we're really dedicating time to the contracts that really like our benefit fitting way fair and also ensuring that we're not like, you know, having things fall by the wayside for these super important vendors, making sure we're still doing diligence where it's needed, but also, you know, not spending time if it's a renewal.
you know, it's not gonna take as long. I think that's really where you can use AI very smartly, where you can just say, here are these four things that I care about, are they contained in this agreement? If not, just add them in.
Cecilia Ziniti15:17
you
Excellent. When do you think, just putting on your prediction hat, when do you think AI will be good enough? Maybe it is already to just pull lawyers out completely.
Mary Ambacher15:37
I think there's a world to Lauren's point of certain contracts that you already can. If you think about it, junior attorneys, I was one once, so I'm allowed to say this, but they're not always that great. Maybe they're sometimes getting it 65, 70 % of the way right. Most AI tools, the big thing people like to say is, well, it's not right all the time. I found mistakes. I was like, right, I found mistakes myself, with my own work that I did five years ago.
Cecilia Ziniti16:05
So.
Mary Ambacher16:07
but we were fine with accepting a B plus or an 85 % on that because that's all you need for that thing. Like we used to talk about that a lot and I still love saying it when, know, SEC work, you need A plus work. That's attention to detail, that's public filings. Some commercial contracts, you know, I'm like, give me your best C. I just need this out the door and we got to help the business move. And there's a lot of AI tools, I think, that are probably already in that B plus range. So they might actually be doing better than.
if I had a junior attorney review an NDA that they've reviewed 100 of them or think about a first year associate that's gone through diligence. And I used to do it and not gonna lie by hour five, you're like, what am I looking at anymore? And the AI is probably picking it up better. Now that's kind of scary because that's a lot of work that might go away. But the thing that I keep grappling with and I don't have a great answer and been asking everyone to chat about is,
How do we get five to 10 years from now when you still need the Lawrence and I who've had this business judgment and have gotten it from practicing for so long if you don't have the junior attorneys starting and getting that from the beginning? So it's just gonna be a very interesting, I think, next 12 to 24 months.
Cecilia Ziniti17:24
Lauren, how does that resonate?
Lauren Anderson17:27
Yeah, no, I
agree. And I think it's also important. So you have the AI tool, but it's also about the user. So the user needs to know exactly what to do to get that B+. I think they need to prompt the AI. The AI has the capabilities, but how do you get there? And I definitely think that it might eliminate some.
staffing, think. don't think, you know, like attorneys in general. But you might have smaller teams, you might have less people looking at contracts, you might be relying on the AI more. But I do think that it gets to a point where the AI can't do everything. Like you need that experience, you need the business judgment. You know, I feel like, at least in my learnings, I've learned a lot. I know the law.
but you don't always think about every terrible outcome that comes out of a commercial contract until something bad happens. So with that experience, it's like I can build that into my review. Okay, the AI picked up, you know, how to make this limitation of liability tighter, but like maybe we need to, think Mary and I spent a lot of time on like SLAs pushing the business to make sure that like, yes, we have the legal protections in place, but what about like from a business standpoint, if this software is something we,
really need, it goes down like, okay, well, what are we gonna do? So like those type of things that maybe, I don't know, like the AI won't actually pick up on or flag to the business is also important. So you gotta have the Marys of the world to keep going.
Cecilia Ziniti19:07
Any good examples of that? I had a guest on the pod a few weeks ago and he talked about how essentially in that SLA context exactly, they had done basically a, I can't remember if it was like a specific indemnity to the SLA or something basically where it was like a, it was like a guarantee. They did a separate exhibit that was a guarantee that was like, hey, if we,
Maybe even sure. It's funny because I guess I feel like a bad lawyer because I don't remember exactly what the mechanic was. But TLDR, it was an appendix where if the vendor did not meet that particular SLA, was like not just a breach, it was various other things were going to kick in. It was essentially a form of liquidated damages, but it was a little bit more sophisticated than that. And no, I know exactly what it was. It was a huge global retailer.
Lauren Anderson19:42
You
Okay.
Cecilia Ziniti20:04
and mentioned doing that. And then lo and behold, that happened. So basically it was like a, it was a many million dollar IT implementation. And then, you know, the vendor came back and was like, we can't do it. want XYZ more dollars. And it turned out that what our, my friend had put in ended up making a huge difference. And the business was like, wow, you know, how'd you know to do that kind of thing? And it was sort of like a good moment for legal. Although of course,
the best moment is like they would have performed the contract. But with that example, anything stand out at you of just like, hey, you know, let's say you got to the B plus answer, or let's say you found a particular agreement strategic enough to warrant the A effort. Anything stick out as just like, wow, like I made Wayfair better or I made EverQuote better.
Mary Ambacher20:35
Yeah.
Cecilia Ziniti20:57
from this particular work. And obviously confidentiality, cetera. But if there's anything you could talk about, that would be helpful. Any big wins, basically.
Mary Ambacher21:05
Yeah, I'm thinking to be honest, it's going to sound simple, but I think one of the biggest things just as a legal team that we changed the mindset of the business over years was no, like no non-renewals at all. And almost anything, even if it's something we probably are going to keep using. And that just came from a long time of trial and error. And especially in this new world of new tools every five minutes.
know, someone tells me they want this for three years and then in six months they're like, just kidding, we found something way better. And that's so hard to be honest, an education point to the business because every SaaS tool, they're gonna hate me saying this, but obviously, you know, they don't want that because...
Cecilia Ziniti21:47
No, no, no, I know. know. And you argument of like,
business continuity and whatever. It's like, no, you're not going to forget.
Mary Ambacher21:52
No, it's for them to be able to budget
out for the next three years that they have that stream of income. And I get it on their point, but also for us is, and it's a huge thing, especially on the, to be honest, when we were looking at all those six legal AI tools, was, you we didn't want to be locked into any one for an extreme period of time because all that's changing every five days. know, Gemini was ahead, then Clod, then ChatGBT. And so you need to be nimble. And I think...
Cecilia Ziniti22:01
Thanks
Mary Ambacher22:20
part of that we tried to instill across other things too, not just the non-renewal, but flexibility is probably, think the biggest thing Lauren and I would say is a big win that we've given them is making sure they were a lot of clauses, getting the ultimate flexibility, whether that was credits for non-used space or just if we're using consultants, like given...
We ended up not needing, just a lot of the flexibility ramping up and down across different things, I think is a huge thing we did. And also just like help push the, that became the business culture. was like, know, contracts here need a lot of flexibility.
Lauren Anderson22:58
Yeah, think also to like kind of bouncing off of that I feel like we've also kind of pushed for termination for convenience which like I feel like is a rarity to actually get but kind of getting comfortable with some sort of like breakup fee like okay if we are entering into a long-form agreement we try and keep
contracts, would say, generally to a year, with three years kind of being the max. But what does that look like? Maybe we should get comfortable. Is this something we're actually going to use in three years? Because I don't think anybody can really make that determination. We do have processes in place to have those type of deals be approved. But I do think kind of getting them comfortable with like these, it's possible.
Cecilia Ziniti23:22
you
Lauren Anderson23:50
a possibility that this isn't going to work out. Like, what are we willing to do or pay to get out of this?
Cecilia Ziniti23:58
I mean, that resonates so hard even now as a CEO where everybody's all excited to use the new marketing consultant, the new tool, the new even we're literally planning for President's Club. We've been selling like crazy and I'm like, I still remember being burned from COVID. I'm like, I don't know if I wanna give the Ritz whatever XYZ money right now. But it's the thing where I...
From the business side, having to think about that, it's kind of like there's this book that's like, that I really like called a Burn the Boats about, you know, energy you spend on plan B is not energy you spend on plan A. And so, you know, kind of move forward and having a great legal team that thinks about that. So I don't have to and kind of saves me from myself. We literally, this is embarrassing what you said about the breakup fee is like, literally we had a marketing advisor that we were going to hire and.
Plans changed and I went and looked at it. We didn't have anything like that So I did the like kind of commercial thing and I sent an email I said hey look, you know wires crossed we can't do this, know five month very heavyweight thing and You know in that case, know business person a business person They they let me out but it would have been nice if they had thought in advance There's a lot of consternation around it and then you know the break-up fees a little more that I would have liked the kind like in the moment fee, but
know, the guy knew that's how it was. So was this something where, you know, have your business people kind of noticed and thanked you? Are there any kind of like great sort of, mean, the Super Bowl ad is a big one. Other big initiatives where it's just like legal gets those shout outs.
Mary Ambacher25:44
yeah, have a Rob on our commercial team on Lauren's team, give him a little shout out, but we had a big marketing deal, you know, kind of same thing like naming rights and stuff like that, that was tied to viewership. And, you know, it was his idea to make sure we were really comfortable on, you know, what those numbers were. And he was just doing some math himself. And yes, obviously the team was helping, but you know, it was just.
we've tried to instill in the lawyers that like, if you see something, say something in terms of that might not just like look right to me, just ask. And that's been a really nice, that was like a really, really nice thing that I'm learning here too is like that where the business is not, you know, they're not wary of the lawyers kind of chiming up and just saying stuff. There's no, you know, ego or ownership pride. And then, you know, when those things come to fruition, yeah, you get a nice kind of, you know, thanks for doing that. Cause you know, we,
We thought it might've gone one way and we're super excited about it. So obviously sometimes, know, rose colored glasses on what you think is going to happen.
Cecilia Ziniti26:48
Well, and I think what you said is a perfect counterbalance to that, where it's not just, you know, okay, we're going to save you from yourself, which of course is hyper useful. But in this case, with the viewership metric, you know, people think like lawyers are not creative. I actually think being an in-house lawyer, you have to be super creative. And, you know, like, especially when you're doing deals in new areas, like we're working on a deal now with a supplier and
you know, debating on, we do it by exactly as you said, do we do it by usage? Do we do it by, you know, an API call? Do we do it by this? Do we do by that? And it's, you know, the lawyers are, their ideas are as good as mine, if not better on that. So how do you, I guess like, how did you get to that level of confidence and how do you instill that in the team? So we have this junior lawyer problem that's a topic in our script, but.
Is it getting the reps? Is it seeing when it goes right, seeing when it goes wrong? What are we going to do to instill that in the next gen?
Mary Ambacher27:54
Wanna go Lauren?
Lauren Anderson27:54
Yeah, I guess I can talk from my own experience. So I think like where I got my confidence, I was at a startup before I came to Wayfair and kind of similar to what Mary said about drinking from the waterfall, that's very much how I felt. I went from IP work to...
supply chain and logistics, which truthfully I knew nothing about, but I did majority contract work. I think you really just need to understand the business. That's like number one. And also just like...
be comfortable with like, you might make the wrong decision and like, that's okay, we can fix it. I don't think at the end of the day, like any of us as attorneys are really gonna make a terribly wrong decision, I hope, but I think you just need to be confident about it. I think you need to really trust your judgment. I think, you you have the foundation as a junior attorney, but like, it also, utilize your resources.
Do
you have outside counsel that has kind of helped in these areas before? Consult them. Do you have, you know, CEO, CFOs, like everybody who's like higher within the company also has much experience. Like always consult them and make sure that your gut is kind of there and like it's not off or, you know, maybe the company has a different risk tolerance or, you know, is risk averse. So I think you really need to understand those foundations.
and then just really trust your knowledge and trust your gut. I think it's definitely reps. Like I think that you just need to like keep going, but you'll get there. And I think that's kind of what we've seen in terms of, you know, junior attorneys struggling as to trust their gut. Like it's okay to not always make the 100 % right decision. And to your point, you have to be creative. Like in-house, it's a must.
You can't be within these parameters. The business wants to get it done. It's our job to figure out how to get it done.
Mary Ambacher30:13
I used to always say to the team there when they would get really nervous or it was like a big thing and you know, it's a lot of people moving fast and you know, even Lauren and I couldn't be looking at every single thing they did because there's just so much work, but you want to make them feel comfortable, obviously to keep going and make decisions. And so I used to just always tell them, are just, you know, we, someone's got to make work for the litigators and they're going to need stuff to do. So I used to always turn around to my coworker, Mike, and just say, you know, I'm keeping, I'm keeping you in business. So it's.
Cecilia Ziniti30:36
you
Hahaha!
Mary Ambacher30:42
you
know, everyone's a come small circle.
Cecilia Ziniti30:45
I mean, I think that's actually a profound point, which is like, perfection is not the thing. that, that essentially, I still remember, I actually rest in peace. I have my torts professor, Levi. He kicked off the torts class with an example, probably quite relevant to Wayfair, which is the optimal, you're, let's say you're gonna ship, you know, porcelain plates across the Pacific, which I'm sure you do. But anyway, if you're gonna do that.
He's like, the optimal number of plates to break on that ship is not zero. He's like, because if it is zero, then it's like you've spent, you've individually packaged each one and you've gone really slow and you know, the cost of replacing, you know, let's say 1 % of the plates or whatever it is, is worth it. And he used it to illustrate the point of like how you approach risk. And I found it really like, it was actually something that like I said, 20, whatever years later, I still come back to it.
But how do you gauge that in a new company? I guess that's an interesting question. So Mary, go to insurance. Insurance is literally like the calculation of this kind of risk. And how do you either set the culture or figure out the culture of that kind of risk taking? So Wayfair, of course, came from the e-commerce days, sells to millions, it's consumer. What was different and how did you figure that out or gauge it?
Mary Ambacher32:08
Yeah, it's a very good question. The first thing that I'm quickly learning, which is great, like we're, you know, a lead gen marketplace in the insurance sector, which is now how I like to say, and everyone would say that to me I'm like, okay, is that like, so we're just, we do insurance? But it's true. It's like how we used to always say, you know, we would always say Wayfair is an e-commerce company that happens to be selling furniture in a sense of like, you know,
It's not a furniture company, right? Like it's an e-commerce tech company, but we're putting all of that e-commerce tech into furniture and decor. And kind of the same thing here, like it's fascinating. I was like, my gosh, am I going to be talking about insurance every day? Like, I don't really know anything about insurance. And I've been here three weeks. And yes, it's obviously an underlying core component, but it's at first and foremost, a tech marketplace that, you know, I'm still living and breathing a lot of the same, just,
tech issues. So that's helped with kind of some of the comfort level. But it's a recalibration of, you know, risk. I truly think the culture of that comes a bit from your top down. You know, what is your leadership team comfortable with? And that truly is part of the game in that you have much more risk averse or risk tolerant folks. And then our job is to learn that and recalibrate for them. And I think I've been in a
Fortunate opportunity, would say at Wayfair, we've always been on a much more risk tolerant, which was great because we get, know, know, protect the company, but also like we want to do innovative, fun things, move fast and do that in the safest way we can. I would say here's very pretty similar in a sense of we want to do a lot of fun things and move fast. I'm learning there's just, know, there's another piece of insurance itself is regulated.
So that's kind of been the biggest, I guess, eye-opening thing, just to make sure I'm taking that extra beat before I'm making maybe the exact same decision I would have made while I was at Wayfair.
Cecilia Ziniti34:12
All right, we've teased Taylor Swift discussion. So let's talk about Taylor. So one of the things Taylor Swift has done is taken a pretty hard line on IP around AI. So tell us that background and then how does that play out in commercial transactions or tech transactions that you all work on?
Mary Ambacher34:34
Yeah, it's, I'm huge Swifty. went to that rest tour many, too many times probably to tell people. And my niece Evelyn is like the biggest fan. We did an entire Taylor Swift photo shoot. So I have a lot of Taylor Swift knowledge, but the coolest thing I think about her is she's kind of been a pioneer in the legal space and a lot of stuff, which has been great. And this is like just another kind of.
Lauren Anderson34:39
Yeah.
Cecilia Ziniti34:42
you
Mary Ambacher35:00
area where she's now making all these IP filings, right, for her likeness, so her image and her voice. She doesn't want AI to use them and that's not been a traditional way to make an IP filing. But I kind of think the biggest thing about it is it's her that's doing it, right? So, you know, if an artist not many of us have heard of have gone and done that, I don't even know how, maybe where they would come out.
at the USPTO in the courts, but because she's doing it and kind of taking a stand and her millions and millions of Swifties like us are like, yes, that's awesome. Like you should protect that. She's kind of already winning in the court of public opinion, which I think might end up making a bigger deal on how this plays out. And then for me taking that a step further, like why I love that she's doing it, because like that's actually her helping all the other artists, right? Because if they're going to do it for Taylor.
Me and Lauren used to call, put the Kanye clause and everything in all of our contracts. And now maybe there'll be the Taylor Swift IP clause that they're all going to get the benefit of because she was the one that came out and did it.
Cecilia Ziniti36:04
Yeah, I mean, she is probably, to your point, the only artist that could stand up to Apple. So when iTunes had a thing where iTunes was giving away basically like three months free when you bought a phone or something like that. And their point of view was the artist should not get paid for those three months free, even if there were a lot of streams. And she wrote a letter that is like literally to your point, masterclass.
in Taylor Swift, let me Google it. Let me ask you, Taylor Swift letter to Apple. Letter to Apple, it's so epic. was, let's see, was five years ago this week, I guess, or five years ago in June. she says, let's see, she says, no, 10 years ago, 2015. I write this to explain why I'm holding back my album 1989 from the new streaming service, Apple Music.
Mary Ambacher36:36
And that was pre-AI, she wrote that herself.
Lauren Anderson36:37
Yeah,
probably with a glitter pen.
Cecilia Ziniti36:59
With all due respect Apple. It's not too late to change this policy. Three months is a long time to go to unpaid. It's unfair to ask anyone to work for nothing. I say this with love, reverence and admiration for everything else Apple has done. I hope that I can join you." And basically, she got the trillion dollar company to move. So yeah, I think it's outstanding. And another reason I'm a Swiftie is this savvy IP. It's so good. All right, Lauren explained to us, what is the Kanye clause?
Lauren Anderson37:28
So it's a morality clause, so termination for cause, guess. Termination in the event, you know, our celebrity clients are involved in some sort of scandal, like alleged or proven. You know, anything that can kind of harm our reputation, we want to be able to get out of the agreement because, you know, I think especially with growing celebrity talent as well as even just like small influencers or
medium size influencers, you do have an inherent risk of, you know, have these people representing your brand, you want to be able to get out if some sort of scandal happens. I feel like these days with the internet, all scandals come to light. you know, and I think that there's a lot of like public discourse when these things do come to light. So how do we protect ourselves? think, you know, Wayfair didn't, to my knowledge, have any experience
with this, but I think, you know, the Kanye clause did come about due to his actions and I think that, you know, the industry reacted. You want to be able to get out of your agreement. I believe Adidas was not able to get out of their agreement or if they did, you know, I'm sure they paid a hefty sum of money to do so because, you know, that just didn't exist. But I think it's kind of to the point of, you
Mary talking about IP and how Taylor's outcome is gonna affect IP clauses. These things, real world examples are why terms and conditions are the way they are. So it's definitely interesting and I'm currently negotiating a Kanye clause right now trying to. Yeah, we need a more middle ground.
Cecilia Ziniti39:19
There you go. That's cool. That's amazing. All right. So fun.
Mary Ambacher39:23
say
Cecilia Ziniti39:23
So fun.
Mary Ambacher39:23
Lauren's being a bit humble, but when we ramped our affiliate kind of marketing program, mean, tens of thousands of probably, you'd say these small, medium influencers that she kind of put a process together to get the team up to speed on the things they should care about. And that was a huge one because to me, was more, it's not the big celebrity, right? Because that's kind of, well, we want to make sure it's in there, but that's going to have a whole bunch of other issues for them.
with all of these, you know, the YouTubers and the TikTok influencers, that's becoming a huge, huge marketing area for e-commerce in particular. And there are lower contract amounts, but you multiply that by, you know, 20,000 and someone says something that, you know, maybe Wayfair doesn't want to be associated with for any reason. And that's kind of the other thing is like making sure these are in our judgment. You know, it's in our judgment that we don't like that.
you know, opinion. Yeah, it's gonna, you know, that's gonna be talking about what we going back to earlier. Like that will be a huge thing that she's done to kind of get in those four, you know, hopefully nothing comes up but to have them.
Cecilia Ziniti40:33
Yeah, I 20,000 influencer agreements. come back to... I mean, but still, it's still like even just a thousand is like just the law of large numbers. You're going to have somebody do something crazy. I mean, I just always like, I was at Yahoo when I started my career and you get some crazy things. remember funny talking about insurance. There was one of the first cases...
Mary Ambacher40:36
I might have exaggerated a little, but it's lots of thousands.
Cecilia Ziniti40:56
around basically the discoverability of Facebook. So if there was a period, it's hard to believe now, but there's a period where whether your Facebook posts were discoverable was like a question. But the case was a woman who had a workers comp claim around being injured at work and said she couldn't work and all this. And then she ended up winning a tree throwing contest.
at the holidays, like a Christmas tree. And she was on the radio station's Facebook page as having won it. so anyway, the more thinking about it is like at scale of like these things of like, it's sort of coming back to what you said of like protecting the company from themselves. And then, even let alone regulated industry, right? So you're in insurance. I remember one of the buy now pay later companies had a matter with the...
the, what's the big consumer regulator, my gosh, that regulates financial, gosh.
CFPB, yes, CFPB. Yeah, so it probably, it was a dual CFPB FTC matter where basically all their influencers were saying, you don't pay anything ever, know, kind of like really not, like not even just not having Tila disclosures, but just like completely misrepresenting them as the product. So they had to come up with a process very similar. So I love this. love being able to talk about Kanye and Taylor and commercial law and IP. just, this is like one of favorites. I know exactly, it's literally, exactly, exactly.
Mary Ambacher42:06
Yeah.
Everyone thinks lawyers are
Cecilia Ziniti42:24
All right, so let's go to the lightning round or closing reflection. So five years from now, what does the legal department look like? What does the great one look like, Lauren?
Lauren Anderson42:36
I think you gotta keep up with the times. I think you need to embrace the AI. think you need to really not retire your lawyer hat, but also really wear a business hat as well. I think we've kind of touched on that through the conversation that, you know, we're just as much here to help with the legal issues as we are with the business. Like how do we really, you know, streamline, make sure that we're hitting milestones, make sure we're delivering the best products,
make sure that we're also covering ourselves in the event of anything were to happen. So I think we really need to like lean into the AI. What can we take away that's bogging us down? Spending less time maybe reading emails. How do you automate that? How can you have someone give you a summary of everything that you received overnight, like that type of thing. So I think it's really leaning into technology.
as well as developing your business knowledge and being smart and creative within the industry.
Mary Ambacher43:46
My turn. I would echo a lot of that. And part of that is what I always think is, know, they're going to need to be savvy AI users, not just in the legal space. So automation across all things, right? Your calendar, your Gmail, writing your performance reviews. Like folks are going to need to be sharp on all of that other stuff so that you're spending your highest ROI time on the big things. And I think another portion of the five years from now is what's the relationship with outside counsel look like, you know?
those fees are just going up and up. And I think the law firms are gonna have a bit of a change over the next few years of how are they gonna do that. They're gonna need to provide different services like diligence reviews and things like that at either lower cost or using these tools. So I'm actually really curious to see, and I think a lot more in-house teams will be relying on themselves on some stuff that they're not today.
because we'll be able to spend more time on some of the higher ROI things ourselves versus like, gotta get all this other stuff done, so let me call outside council on this question. So I think you're gonna see leaner teams and probably some in certain areas less reliance on outside council.
Cecilia Ziniti45:02
What do you still go to outside council for today?
Mary Ambacher45:05
question. For me, I think the big thing that I'm finding, like where are the gaps into that thing where the two main areas I go to outside counsel still for are, I really, really want the market data. So it's like something maybe we haven't done before and I got to go tell my CEO, like, look, most people are doing this. Here's the high end, the low end. Let's make a decision for us. And I just obviously won't have that from, especially working at two companies. I've got a lot of friends, but it's nice to just get that full.
market data and then probably the second is when you need a really specialized thing. So there's probably certain areas in the insurance regulations I'm going to need to go talk to somebody about or crazy new privacy law or something like that. But other than that, know, Lauren can attest to and I give, you know, Enrique and Andrew over at Wayfair a lot of credit. Like they instilled in us to, you know, we can do a lot ourselves. You're all smart people. We had worked at law firms, a lot of us. And so, you know, we always kind of were of that mindset of
you really go for the high ticket items.
Cecilia Ziniti46:09
I love it. All right, let's do a lightning round of clothes. So a book, leader or podcast that shaped how you think Lauren.
Lauren Anderson46:17
So I think a leader is my mentor really shaped how I think, you know, he kind of really championed me to kind of own my knowledge, own my business inputs, like all of that. think when I first started, was a little kind of had imposter syndrome and I was at these companies with, you know, all of these super intelligent people who have worked in Silicon Valley and I'm just, you know, this junior lawyer who's trying to figure things out.
So he really championed me, I think, yeah, I don't think I would have the confidence and the knowledge base that I have without him.
Cecilia Ziniti46:59
Mary,
a book leader podcast that shaped you.
Mary Ambacher47:04
I just read, literally this week, while I was at jury duty, which was another fun thing, The Algorithm by John McNeil. he worked at Tesla with Elon in the early ages when they were really trying to basically make it more efficient. And actually, I was given the book when I was at Wayfair. They gave it to a lot of us to kind of read.
Funny, the first day I walked in here, one of the board of directors handed me the book and I was like, I just read this, but thank you. But it's fascinating because it talks through basically Elon's kind of five step, he called it the algorithm, but like to make something efficient and move fast and in working in tech, was really, really interesting just to have it written down. I think we hear a lot of those things, but how do you move fast while innovating and reducing risk or figuring out the risk to take?
And I think reading it as lawyers is really interesting, especially in-house attorneys, because this is what your business counterparts are trying to do every day. So it's just kind of fascinating and kind of excited to see how that may actually change my mindset a bit as I dig in here.
Cecilia Ziniti48:16
I it. We're gonna do book club. We'll do GCAI, Ceasing and Friends Book Club. Excited. Lauren and I can catch up. All right, Lauren, what is one piece of advice that you would give your younger self in two sentences?
Lauren Anderson48:30
So I would say that you belong in the room that you are in and to You you've earned your seat so Feel like hold your own and you know you have the knowledge and the capabilities to be there. So just have more confidence
Cecilia Ziniti48:52
Mary, how about you?
Mary Ambacher48:54
You're never actually going to learn at all. Because I think I had this mindset of, know, one day you'll know everything or you'll have learned all the laws. Yep. And, you know, you're just going to learn to become more comfortable making the decisions. Like, that's really what you learn over time.
Cecilia Ziniti49:01
You will reach the end of the internet.
Love it. Wow, this has been so much fun. Thank you so much for joining me on the show.
Mary Ambacher49:16
Thank you for having us, Lauren. It's nice to see you.
Lauren Anderson49:19
Thank you. I know I miss you.
Cecilia Ziniti49:23
That was my conversation with Mary Ambacher, Deputy General Counsel at EverQuote and Lauren Anderson, Senior Counsel at Wayfair. If you want to see how in-house legal teams are using AI and including for fun things like Kanye clauses, head over to gc.ai. Follow Susie and friends wherever you get your podcasts. We'll see you next time. Thank you.


